Here it is, the final weekend, and as usual, there is a jumble in the ECAC. Take a look at the standings.
1 SLU 29
2 Clk 28
3 Cor 23
Har 23
5 Dar 22
6 RPI 20
Yal 20
8 Pri 19
9 Uni 18
10 Ver 16
11 Col 15
12 Brn 7
Here are the definites:
Now, let’s list the tiebreakers.
Our advice to figure this all out? Just wait until 10:30 on Saturday night.
How High Can You Go, How Low Can You Go?
Let’s keep it brief once again. What we’ll do is give you a best case scenario, a worst-case scenario, and a little handicapping from our point of view (take that with a grain of salt, as Normand Chouinard will tell you).
Remember, all scenarios that we paint are just one way of getting to the result. There are different combinations. We just give you one or two examples.
St. Lawrence
Best Case — 1st
How? — Two wins and the Saints are the champs. Or, two Clarkson losses.
Worst Case — 2nd
How? — Two losses and one Clarkson win. Or, only one win and two Clarkson wins.
Handicapping — The Saints have to travel to two tough places to play, the Gut and Thompson. It won’t be easy for the Saints to pull off two wins.
Clarkson
Best Case — 1st
How? — Two wins and one St. Lawrence loss. Or, one win and two St. Lawrence losses.
Worst Case — 2nd
How? — Two St. Lawrence wins, or two losses by the Knights.
Handicapping — See above in reference to St. Lawrence. The Knights are in the same boat.
Cornell
Best Case — 3rd
How? — Two wins. The Big Red win the tiebreaker over Harvard by virtue of a win and a tie. Or, one win and a loss, plus at least one loss by Rensselaer and Yale, one loss and a win by Harvard, and no more than two points by Dartmouth.
Worst Case — 8th
How? — The Big Red lose two, Rensselaer sweeps, Dartmouth wins one game, Yale and Harvard tie their game, Yale defeats Brown, Harvard loses to Princeton and Princeton defeats Brown. Cornell loses a three-way tiebreaker to Yale and Princeton.
Handicapping — The Big Red face two teams in the lower half of the league right now, but that doesn’t really matter. At home, and after losing two on the road, the Big Red should come away with at least one win.
Harvard
Best Case — 3rd
How? — The Crimson win two and Cornell takes less than four points.
Worst Case — 8th
How? — The key is that Rensselaer is not in the top five, so Harvard loses two, Cornell takes at least one point, Princeton sweeps, Dartmouth sweeps, Yale sweeps and Rensselaer sweeps. The Crimson then lose a top five tiebreaker to Princeton.
Handicapping — The Crimson should be able to knock of Yale on Friday night, but finishing the sweep against Princeton may be tough. The Crimson has only completed a weekend sweep once this year, and that was against RPI and Union back in early January.
Dartmouth
Best Case — 3rd
How? — Dartmouth sweeps and Cornell and Harvard do not take more than three points each. A three way tie between Dartmouth, Cornell and Harvard goes to Dartmouth.
Worst Case — 9th
How? — Dartmouth loses two, Rensselaer sweeps, Yale sweeps, Princeton sweeps, Union sweeps. The Big Green then lose a top five tiebreaker to Union.
Handicapping — The good news is that Dartmouth plays much better in front of its home crowd (9–4–0 at home versus a 3–7–4 away record). The bad news is that Big Green will be taking on the North Country duo — St. Lawrence and Clarkson — vying for the league crown.
Rensselaer
Best Case — 3rd
How? — Yale takes no more than three points, Dartmouth, Harvard and Cornell are swept and the Engineers sweep.
Worst Case — 9th
How? — Rensselaer is swept, Union wins one game and Princeton takes two points. Rensselaer loses a head-to-head tiebreaker to Union.
Handicapping — On the road at Cornell will be tough. A game at Colgate is winnable for the Engineers, but a sweep may be too much to ask.
Yale
Best Case — 3rd
How? — The Bulldogs sweep and Harvard, Cornell and Dartmouth get swept. Even if Rensselaer sweeps, the Bulldogs win a top ten tiebreaker.
Worst Case — 10th
How? — Yale loses twice, Rensselaer, Union, Vermont, Princeton sweep. The Bulldogs then lose a top five tiebreaker to Vermont.
Handicapping — Yale picked a good time to go on a three-game winning streak, scoring 19 goals in its last three games. The Bulldogs offense should have no troubles against Brown’s defense, but the team has notoriously struggled at Bright.
Princeton
Best Case — 3rd
How? — Princeton sweeps, Harvard is swept, Yale and Rensselaer each loses one game, Cornell is swept, Dartmouth gets only one point. The Tigers then win a head-to-head tiebreaker over Dartmouth, Cornell and Harvard.
Worst Case — 11th
How? — Princeton is swept, Vermont gets three points, Colgate sweeps, Union beats Cornell. The Tigers lose a three-way head to head tiebreaker with Colgate and Vermont to Colgate, then lose a top five tiebreaker to Vermont.
Handicapping — The Tigers shouldn’t have a problem splitting this weekend’s series — they’ve done that plenty of times this year — but a sweep may be too much to ask for.
Union
Best Case — 5th
How? — Union sweeps, Rensselaer, Dartmouth and Yale are swept, and Princeton only takes two points. Union then wins a top five tiebreaker over Dartmouth.
Worst Case — 11th
How? — Union is swept. Colgate sweeps and Vermont takes at least three points. Union is then alone in eleventh.
Handicapping — The Skating Dutchmen played one of their best games of the year last weekend against Harvard. Union beat both Colgate and Cornell athome earlier this year, but taking on these two teams on the road may prove to be a tougher challenge. A split is possible, a sweep unlikely.
Vermont
Best Case — 7th
How? — Vermont sweeps, Rensselaer sweeps, Yale is swept, Union is swept, Princeton is swept and Dartmouth is swept. Vermont then wins a top five tiebreaker over Yale.
Worst Case — 11th
How? — Vermont is swept and Colgate gets one point. Colgate wins the head-to-head tiebreaker.
Handicapping — The prognosis for the Cats doesn’t look very good. With its very playoff life at stake this weekend, the team must host the two best teams in the league. The only sliver of hope is the fact that the home crowd will be on Vermont’s side. This will be a test to see just how powerful the Catamount faithful really is.
Colgate
Best Case — 8th
How? — Colgate sweeps, Vermont takes three points exactly and Princeton is swept. Colgate wins a three-way head-to-head tiebreaker for eighth.
Worst Case — 11th
How? — Colgate loses two.
Handicapping — The Red Raiders are in the midst of a three–game slide and will need to keep the score down in both contests to have a chance. With its playoff life at stake, Colgate should manage at least one win this weekend.
Brown
Best Case — 12th
How? — Doesn’t matter what happens.
Worst Case — 12th
How? — Doesn’t matter what happens.
Handicapping — Play spoiler, that’s the plan. The Bears are looking to the future and hoping to mess up Princeton and Yale’s chances of home ice and positioning.
Let’s Have Some Fun
Say this happens:
Rensselaer d. Cornell
Yale d. Harvard
Princeton d. Brown
Clarkson d. Vermont
St. Lawrence d. Dartmouth
Colgate d. Union
Rensselaer t. Colgate
Yale t. Brown
Union d. Cornell
Princeton d. Harvard
Clarkson t. Dartmouth
St. Lawrence d. Vermont
Your standings become:
1 SLU 33
2 Clk 31
3 Cor 23
Dar 23
Har 23
Pri 23
RPI 23
Yal 23
9 Uni 20
10 Col 18
11 Ver 16
12 Brn 7
That’s a six–way tie for third place. What happens?
Your playoff matchups:
How about a five–way tie for fifth place?
For that to happen:
Cornell d. Rensselaer
Harvard d. Yale
Union d. Colgate
Princeton d. Brown
Clarkson d. Vermont
St. Lawrence d. Dartmouth
Rensselaer d. Colgate
Yale d. Brown
Union d. Cornell
Princeton t. Harvard
Clarkson d. Dartmouth
Vermont d. St. Lawrence
Your standings:
1 Clk 32
2 SLU 31
3 Har 26
4 Cor 25
5 Dar 22
Pri 22
RPI 22
Uni 22
Yal 22
10 Ver 16
11 Col 15
12 Brn 7
So what happens?
Your playoff pairings:
How about a four–way tie for eighth place? Which team loses out in the tiebreaker and stays home?
For that to happen:
Cornell d. Rensselaer
Harvard d. Yale
Colgate d. Union
Brown d. Princeton
Clarkson t. Vermont
St. Lawrence d. Dartmouth
Colgate d. Rensselaer
Yale d. Brown
Union t. Cornell
Harvard d. Princeton
Clarkson d. Dartmouth
Vermont d. St. Lawrence
The standings then become:
1 Clk 31
SLU 31
3 Har 27
4 Cor 26
5 Dar 22
Yal 22
7 RPI 20
8 Col 19
Pri 19
Uni 19
Ver 19
12 Brn 9
How does that break down?
To decide, we have to break the tie for fifth place first.
Now we can break the four–way tie.
One more tiebreaker to apply before we give you the playoff scenarios.
Now, the playoff matchups:
One more for you, folks. We know this would shock people, but what if there were no need for tiebreakers?
Here’s what has to happen.
Rensselaer d. Cornell
Harvard d. Yale
Colgate d. Union
Princeton d. Brown
Clarkson d. Vermont
St. Lawrence d. Dartmouth
Rensselaer d. Colgate
Brown d. Yale
Cornell d. Union
Harvard d. Princeton
Clarkson d. Dartmouth
St. Lawrence d. Vermont
Our new standings:
1 SLU 33
2 Clk 32
3 Har 27
4 Cor 25
5 RPI 24
6 Dar 22
7 Pri 21
8 Yal 20
9 Uni 18
10 Col 17
11 Ver 16
12 Brn 9
Wow, no ties to break!
The playoff matchups:
Yeah, we know, no tiebreakers in the ECAC, there’s a better chance of someone beating the Iron Columnists four weeks in a row.
There is one thing that cannot happen. We cannot get the same five matchups as last season’s playoffs. That is impossible no matter how you slice it. The main reason — it’s impossible to match up Yale and Colgate.
Play along with all the possibilities. Just head to Joe Schlobotnik’s ECAC Playoff Possibilities Script.
If It’s So Easy, You Try It
It may be time to commit hara-kiri. Three in a row. The Iron Columnists have lost three in a row to Normand Chouinard. Congratulations to Normand! Chairman Brule is ready to supply us with the necessary tools.
The contest thus far:
Becky and Jayson d. Vic Brzozowski — (10–2–2) — (8–5–1)
Becky and Jayson d. Tayt Brooks — (7–7–1) — (5–9–1)
Becky and Jayson d. Michele Kelley — (5–4–3) — (2–7–3)
Becky and Jayson d. C.J. Poux — (9– 4–2) — (6–7–2)
Becky and Jayson d. Shawn Natole — (5–8–0) — (3–10–0)
Becky and Jayson t. Julian Saltman — (7–4–2) — (7–4–2)
Becky and Jayson d. Julian Saltman — (9–2–0) — (6–5–0)
Becky and Jayson d. Steve Lombardo — (8–4–1) — (6–6–1)
Normand Chouinard d. Becky and Jayson — (8–4–0) — (4–8–0)
Normand Chouinard d. Becky and Jayson — (7–4–1) — (6–5–1)
Normand Chouinard d. Becky and Jayson — (9–1–2) — (5–5–2)
If memory serves us right, Normand Chouinard took the Iron Columnists down for the third week in a row. This week, he goes for four in a row. Chairman Brule has prepared a very extra special theme ingredient this week, so, Norman Chouinard, bring your skills into USCHO Stadium and try to take down the Iron Columnists once again. Whose picks will reign supreme?
The Picks
Friday, March 2
St. Lawrence at Dartmouth
Normand’s Pick — If Anderson plays, this probably reverses. Dartmouth 4, St. Lawrence 3
Becky and Jayson — Dartmouth 4, Vermont 1
Clarkson at Vermont
Normand’s Pick — Clarkson 3, Vermont 1
Becky and Jayson — Clarkson 4, Vermont 2
Rensselaer at Cornell
Normand’s Pick — Cornell 3, Rensselaer 1
Becky and Jayson — Cornell 2, Rensselaer 0
Union at Colgate
Normand’s Pick — Colgate 4, Union 2
Becky and Jayson — Colgate 4, Union 3
Yale at Harvard
Normand’s Pick — Yale 3, Harvard 2
Becky and Jayson — Harvard 3, Yale 2
Princeton at Brown
Normand’s Pick — Princeton 4, Brown 2
Becky and Jayson — Princeton 6, Brown 2
Saturday, March 3
St. Lawrence at Vermont
Normand’s Pick — St. Lawrence 3, Vermont 2
Becky and Jayson — St. Lawrence 2, Vermont 1
Clarkson at Dartmouth
Normand’s Pick — Clarkson 4, Dartmouth 3
Becky and Jayson — Dartmouth 3, Clarkson 2
Rensselaer at Colgate
Normand’s Pick — Colgate 4, Rensselaer 2
Becky and Jayson — Colgate 3, Rensselaer 2
Union at Cornell
Normand’s Pick — Cornell 3, Union 1
Becky and Jayson — Cornell 3, Union 2
Yale at Brown
Normand’s Pick — Yale 3, Brown 2
Becky and Jayson — Yale 4, Brown 1
Princeton at Harvard
Normand’s Pick — Harvard 4, Princeton 3
Becky and Jayson — Harvard 5, Princeton 4
This is it — the final installment of the Iron Columnists. Thanks to everyone who put their name in the hat and next year, we’ll be back to give everyone another shot.
Some More Fun
Since Normand has thrice bested the Iron Columnists, let’s take a look at how both think the standings will go and what the playoffs will look like.
Normand’s Picks
1 Clk 32
2 SLU 31
3 Cor 27
4 Har 25
5 Dar 24
Yal 24
7 Pri 21
8 RPI 20
9 Col 19
10 Uni 18
11 Ver 16
12 Brn 7
Normand’s Playoffs:
The Iron Columnists’ Picks
With our predictions, this is how we believe the ECAC will finish. Which means it won’t be this way.
1 SLU 31
2 Clk 30
3 Cor 27
Har 27
5 Dar 26
6 Yal 22
7 Pri 21
8 RPI 20
9 Col 19
10 Uni 18
11 Ver 16
12 Brn 7
Our playoffs:
See you somewhere next weekend!