We’re at that time of the year where one thing is on everyone’s minds.
Will my team make the NCAA tournament? Where does it sit in the PairWise Rankings (PWR)?
Those of you that are veterans of the college hockey scene know that it is all about the PairWise Rankings. This is USCHO’s numerical approach that simulates the way the NCAA Division I men’s ice hockey committee chooses the teams that make the NCAA tournament.
Since USCHO began the PairWise Rankings, we have correctly identified all of the teams that have been selected to the NCAA tournament.
Five of the last six years, I am the only prognosticator to have correctly predicted the exact brackets for the NCAA tournament, meaning that I have predicted how the committee thought when putting together the brackets.
With that in mind, it’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament might look like come selection time, using what we know now.
It’s a look into the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.
This is not a be-all, end-all analysis of the bracket. I am trying to give you, the reader, an idea of what the committee might be thinking and not exactly what they are thinking.
This is the next installment of Bracketology for 2017, and we’ll be bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced on March 19.
If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.
Here are the facts:
• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.
• There are four regional sites (East – Providence, R.I.; Northeast – Manchester, N.H.; Midwest – Cincinnati, Ohio; West – Fargo, N.D.).
• A host institution that is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host and cannot be moved. The host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, New Hampshire in Manchester, Miami in Cincinnati and North Dakota in Fargo.
• Seedings will not be switched. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intra-conference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.
Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, from the 2015 pre-championship manual:
In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts, including competitive equity, financial success and the likelihood of a playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For this model, the following is a basic set of priorities:
1. Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s rankings of 1-16. The top four teams are No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds.
2. Step two is to place the home teams. Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.
3. Step three is to fill in the bracket so that first-round conference matchups are avoided, unless it corrupts the integrity of the bracket. If five or more teams from one conference are selected to the championship, then the integrity of the bracket will be protected (i.e., maintaining the pairing process according to seed will take priority over avoidance of first-round conference matchups). To complete each regional, the committee assigns one team from each of the remaining seeded groups so there is a No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 seed at each regional site.
Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders through all games of January 10:
1 Penn State
2t Harvard
2t Denver
4t Minnesota-Duluth
4t Boston University
6 Massachusetts-Lowell
7 North Dakota
8 Western Michigan
9 Union
10 Vermont
11 Minneosta
12 Boston College
13 Ohio State
14 St. Lawrence
15 Cornell
16 Notre Dame
17 Air Force
23 Bemidji State
Current conference leaders based on winning percentage:
Atlantic Hockey: Air Force
Big Ten: Penn State (by virtue of winning percentage over Ohio State in tiebreaker over Minnesota and Wisconsin, it’s complicated)
ECAC Hockey: Union
Hockey East: Boston College
NCHC: Denver
WCHA: Bemidji State
Notes
• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played — i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.
• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine the current leader in each conference. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion after applying the tiebreakers.
Step one
From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.
We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. The only teams that are not are Air Force and Bemidji State.
From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.
The ties and bubbles consist of none this week.
We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.
Therefore, the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:
1 Penn State
2 Harvard
3 Denver
4 Minnesota-Duluth
5 Boston University
6 Massachusetts-Lowell
7 North Dakota
8 Western Michigan
9 Union
10 Vermont
11 Minneosta
12 Boston College
13 Ohio State
14 St. Lawrence
15 Air Force
16 Bemidji State
Step two
Now it’s time to assign the seeds.
No. 1 seeds: Penn State, Harvard, Denver, Minnesota-Duluth
No. 2 seeds: Boston University, Massachusetts-Lowell, North Dakota, Western Michigan
No. 3 seeds: Union, Vermont, Minnesota, Boston College
No. 4 seeds: Ohio State, St. Lawrence, Air Force, Bemidji State
Step three
Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.
No. 1 Penn State is placed in the Midwest Regional in Cincinnati.
No. 2 Harvard is placed in the East Regional in Providence.
No. 3 Denver is placed in the West Regional in Fargo
No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
Step four
Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.
Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).
If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships would be played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.
So therefore:
No. 2 seeds
North Dakota is a host, therefore they are placed first in this pod:
No. 7 North Dakota is placed in No. 2 Denver’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 8 Western Michigan is placed in No. 1 Penn State’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell is placed in No. 2 Harvard’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 5 Boston University is placed in No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 3 seeds
Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16; another with 2, 7, 10 and 15; another with 3, 6, 11 and 14; and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.
No. 9 Union is placed in No. 8 Western Michigan’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 10 Vermont is placed in No. 7 North Dakota’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 11 Minnesota is placed in No. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 12 Boston College is placed in No. 5 Boston University’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
No. 4 seeds
One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.
No. 16 Bemidji State is sent to No. 1 Penn State’s regional, the Midwest Regional.
No. 15 Air Force is sent to No. 2 Harvard’s regional, the East Regional.
No. 14 St. Lawrence is sent to No. 3 Denver’s regional, the West Regional.
No. 13 Ohio State is sent to No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth’s regional, the Northeast Regional.
The brackets as we have set them up:
East Regional (Providence):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Harvard
11 Minnesota vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Ohio State vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
12 Boston College vs. 5 Boston University
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Penn State
9 Union vs. 8 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
14 St. Lawrence vs. 3 Denver
10 Vermont vs. 7 North Dakota
Our first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We have one – Boston College vs. Boston University.
Let’s solve this.
We can swap Union and Boston College. We can’t move BC to Providence, because that creates another all-Hockey East matchup.
East Regional (Providence):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Harvard
11 Minnesota vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Ohio State vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
9 Union vs. 5 Boston University
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Penn State
12 Boston College vs. 8 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
14 St. Lawrence vs. 3 Denver
10 Vermont vs. 7 North Dakota
Now, the big question again – how can we improve attendance at these regionals?
We can swap Ohio State and St. Lawrence.
East Regional (Providence):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Harvard
11 Minnesota vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 St. Lawrence vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
9 Union vs. 5 Boston University
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Penn State
12 Boston College vs. 8 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
13 Ohio State vs. 3 Denver
10 Vermont vs. 7 North Dakota
Now if you look at this, what else can you do in order to make attendance better? Maybe if we swapped the entire East and Northeast brackets?
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Harvard
11 Minnesota vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell
East Regional (Providence):
14 St. Lawrence vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
9 Union vs. 5 Boston University
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Penn State
12 Boston College vs. 8 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
13 Ohio State vs. 3 Denver
10 Vermont vs. 7 North Dakota
What does this do? It gets 2 ECAC teams in Providence, after all the ECAC is the host. You get two more “local” teams to Manchester this way also.
I like it.
I think this is about all we can do this week.
So that is it. My bracket for the week.
But remember: There are so many changes between now and the actual bracket announcement.
See you here in a few weeks for the next Bracketology.
Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.
This week’s brackets
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Harvard
11 Minnesota vs. 6 Massachusetts-Lowell
East Regional (Providence):
14 St. Lawrence vs. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
9 Union vs. 5 Boston University
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Penn State
12 Boston College vs. 8 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
13 Ohio State vs. 3 Denver
10 Vermont vs. 7 North Dakota
Conference breakdowns
Hockey East — 4
NCHC — 4
Big Ten — 3
ECAC Hockey — 3
WCHA — 1
Atlantic Hockey – 1
Last Week’s Bracket
East Regional (Providence):
13 Ohio State vs. 4 Harvard
10 Minnesota vs. 5 Massachusetts-Lowell
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Boston College vs. 3 Denver
11 Vermont vs. 8 Union
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
15 Air Force vs. 2 Penn State
12 Notre Dame vs. 7 Western Michigan
West Regional (Fargo):
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 Minnesota-Duluth
9 North Dakota vs. 6 Boston University
