It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style.
It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament might look like come selection time, using what we know now.
It’s a look into the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.
This is not a be-all, end-all analysis of the bracket. I am trying to give you, the reader, an idea of what the committee might be thinking and not exactly what they are thinking.
We’ll be bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced on the evening of March 24.
If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.
Here are the facts:
• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.
• There are four regional sites (East – Providence, R.I.(March 30-31); Northeast – Manchester, N.H.(March 29-30); Midwest – Allentown, Pa.(March 30-31); West – Fargo, N.D.(March 29-30).
• A host institution that is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host and cannot be moved. The host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, University of New Hampshire in Manchester, Penn State in Allentown and North Dakota in Fargo.
• Seedings will not be switched. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intra-conference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.
Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, from the 2019 pre-championship manual:
In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts, including competitive equity, financial success and the likelihood of a playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For this model, the following is a basic set of priorities:
1. Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s rankings of 1-16. The top four teams are No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds.
2. Step two is to place the home teams. Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.
3. Step three is to fill in the bracket so that first-round conference matchups are avoided, unless it corrupts the integrity of the bracket. If five or more teams from one conference are selected to the championship, then the integrity of the bracket will be protected (i.e., maintaining the pairing process according to seed will take priority over avoidance of first-round conference matchups). To complete each regional, the committee assigns one team from each of the remaining seeded groups so there is a No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 seed at each regional site.
Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders through all games of January 29:
1t St. Cloud State
1t Massachusetts
3 Minnesota Duluth
4 Quinnipiac
5 Ohio State
6 Denver
7 Minnesota State
8 Western Michigan
9 Cornell
10t Providence
10t Clarkson
12 Arizona State
13 Northeastern
14 Notre Dame
15 Harvard
16 Bowling Green
32 Air Force
Current conference leaders based on winning percentage BOLDED Above:
Atlantic Hockey: Air Force
Big Ten: Ohio State
ECAC Hockey: Cornell
Hockey East: Massachusetts
NCHC: St. Cloud State
WCHA: Minnesota State
Notes
• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played — i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.
• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine the current leader in each conference. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion after applying the tiebreakers.
Step one
From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.
We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. The only teams that is not is Air Force.
From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.
The ties and bubbles consist of St. Cloud State and Massachusetts at 1 and Providence and Clarkson at 10.
We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.
Therefore, the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:
1 St. Cloud State
2 Massachusetts
3 Minnesota Duluth
4 Quinnipiac
5 Ohio State
6 Denver
7 Minnesota State
8 Western Michigan
9 Cornell
10 Providence
11 Clarkson
12 Arizona State
13 Northeastern
14 Notre Dame
15 Harvard
16 Air Force
Step two
Now it’s time to assign the seeds.
No. 1 seeds: St. Cloud State, Massachusetts, Minnesota Duluth, Quinnipiac
No. 2 seeds: Ohio State, Denver, Minnesota State, Western Michign
No. 3 seeds: Cornell, Providence, Clarkson, Arizona State
No. 4 seeds: Northeastern, Notre Dame, Harvard, Air Force
Step three
Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.
No. 1 St. Cloud State is place in Fargo
No. 2 Massachusetts is placed in Manchester
No. 3 Minnesota Duluth is placed in Allentown
No. 4 Quinnipiac is placed in Providence
Step four
Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.
Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).
If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships would be played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.
So therefore:
No. 2 seeds
No. 8 Western Michigan is placed in No. 1 St. Cloud’s regional, the West Regional
No. 7 Minnesota State is placed in No. 2 Massachusett’s regional, the Northeast Regional
No. 6 Denver is placed in No. 3 Minnesota Duluth’s regional, the Midwest Regional
No. 5 Ohio State is placed in No. 4 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional
No. 3 seeds
Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16; another with 2, 7, 10 and 15; another with 3, 6, 11 and 14; and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.
No. 9 Cornell is placed in No. 8 Western Michigan’s regional, the West Regional
No. 10 Providence is placed in No. 7 Minnesota State’s regional, the Northeast Regional
No. 11 Clarkson is placed in No. 6 Denver’s regional, the Midwest Regional
No. 12 Arizona State is placed in No. 5 Ohio State’s regional, the East Regional
No. 4 seeds
One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.
No. 16 Air Force travels to No. 1 St. Cloud State’s regional, the West Regional
No. 15 Harvard travels to No. 2 Massachusett’s regional, the Northeast Regional
No. 14 Notre Dame travels to No. 3 Minnesota Duluth’s regional, the Midwest Regional
No. 13 Northeastern travels to No. 4 Quinnipiac’s regional, the East Regional
The brackets as we have set them up:
West Regional (Fargo):
16 Air Force vs. 1 St. Cloud State
9 Cornell vs. 8 Western Michigan
Midwest Regional (Allentown):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth
11 Clarkson vs. 6 Denver
East Regional (Providence):
13 Northeastern vs. 4 Quinnipiac
12 Arizona State vs. 5 Ohio State
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts
10 Providence vs. 7 Minnesota State
Our first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We have none.
Then the next question is, how can we improve attendance at these regionals?
Providence should be in Providence right? The committee did that last year, so why again this year? Swap Providence-Minnesota State with Arizona State-Ohio State.
West Regional (Fargo):
16 Air Force vs. 1 St. Cloud State
9 Cornell vs. 8 Western Michigan
Midwest Regional (Allentown):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth
11 Clarkson vs. 6 Denver
East Regional (Providence):
13 Northeastern vs. 4 Quinnipiac
10 Providence vs. 7 Minnesota State
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts
12 Arizona State vs. 5 Ohio State
Would Ohio State be a benefit to Allentown? Perhaps. It is a bit closer. Swap Arizona State-Ohio State with Clarkson-Denver.
West Regional (Fargo):
16 Air Force vs. 1 St. Cloud State
9 Cornell vs. 8 Western Michigan
Midwest Regional (Allentown):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth
12 Arizona State vs. 5 Ohio State
East Regional (Providence):
13 Northeastern vs. 4 Quinnipiac
10 Providence vs. 7 Minnesota State
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts
11 Clarkson vs. 6 Denver
And that looks like about it.
I think this is about all we can do this week.
That’s my bracket for the week based on how I think the committee will think.
See you next week for the next Bracketology.
Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.
This week’s brackets
West Regional (Fargo):
16 Air Force vs. 1 St. Cloud State
9 Cornell vs. 8 Western Michigan
Midwest Regional (Allentown):
14 Notre Dame vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth
12 Arizona State vs. 5 Ohio State
East Regional (Providence):
13 Northeastern vs. 4 Quinnipiac
10 Providence vs. 7 Minnesota State
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
15 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts
11 Clarkson vs. 6 Denver
Conference breakdowns
ECAC Hockey — 4
NCHC — 4
Hockey East — 3
Big Ten — 2
WCHA — 1
Atlantic Hockey – 1
Independent – 1
Last Week’s Bracket
West Regional (Fargo):
16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State
9 Cornell vs. 8 Minnesota State
Midwest Regional (Allentown):
14 Notre Dame vs. 4 Minnesota Duluth
12 Bowling Green vs. 5 Ohio State
East Regional (Providence):
15 Union vs. 3 Denver
11 Arizona State vs. 6 Quinnipiac
Northeast Regional (Manchester):
13 Western Michigan vs. 2 Massachusetts
10 Clarkson vs. 7 Northeastern
Out: Bowling Green (12), Union (15), American International (16)
In: Providence (10), Harvard (15), Air Force (16)
