The CCHA told Alabama-Huntsville to point its charge toward respectability elsewhere. That’s interesting.

More than a few former college coaches (now coaching professionally) have mentioned on many occasions that the appearance given by the college hockey world is that there is no urgency to grow Division I college hockey. Yes, there are Web sites and campaigns to keep elite-level American hockey players out of Canadian Major Junior and in U.S. college programs. While we all know there was more to this decision by the CCHA to exclude Alabama-Huntsville than meets the eye, you do have to openly wonder about the growth of the sport at the NCAA Division I level.

Don’t mistake this as an open campaign for the Chargers to be in one of the Big Four conferences. When you take a look at the program you do have cause for optimism as a CCHA team. You have a CCHA alum in Danton Cole as the head coach — a guy who played at Michigan State under college hockey’s all-time wins leader, Ron Mason, and was a member of the 1986 national title team.

The guy has a Stanley Cup ring as a player with the New Jersey Devils. How many college hockey programs boast a bench boss with those credentials? To review for a moment, a national title ring in college, playing for an elite NCAA program, playing in the NHL, winning a Stanley Cup. Say what you want about Massachusetts, but it has an assistant in Red Gendron who also has a Devils Stanley Cup ring, and that just lends credibility to your program, folks.

Not that any of that makes you a good coach, but Cole is currently with USA Hockey coaching the Under-18 select team at the Ivan Hlinka Memorial Tourney in Slovakia. That lends credibility.

Travel was put out there as a possible reason why UAH was excluded. Jim Connelly, my colleague from Boston, described the travel as being no worse than it was to Omaha and just as demanding as going to Alaska.

You want to ask if Huntsville will draw fans at the arenas of the big CCHA programs?

Michigan would sell out if it was playing St. Norbert. That is just a rabid fan base that loves its team. Notre Dame is turning away people at the doors every night due to its resurgence and it actually has a history with Huntsville from their epic double-overtime win in the NCAA tournament a couple of years ago.

Miami loves its hockey and that building filled up on a freezing cold Saturday night against Bowling Green last season. Ohio State has its share of attendance challenges with the big building but it is supportive especially as the season winds down and hockey becomes more prominent on the sports calendar. Michigan State has had some attendance issues lately, but will Huntsville attract less fans than Western or Lake State?

Huntsville is actually an interesting hockey market. During my time as an assistant coach in the Central Hockey League, the Huntsville Channel Cats played to very full buildings. The fact that they had a good squad reminiscent of the Charlestown Chiefs didn’t hurt but they were a good franchise that won titles at the single A level (Southern Hockey League) and the AA level (Central League). The year they won the SHL title the Chargers won the Division II national title and Huntsville branded itself the “Hockey Capital of the South.”

The Von Braun Center is a great building for hockey and in the CCHA it would be in the upper echelon of facilities. Being in the CCHA would help recruiting as it offers a nice campus, good facilities and a strong tradition similar to Bemidji State at the D-II and D-III level. I wonder if some of the more remote schools in the CCHA expressed concern in that area.

It would make sense and if I coached at Northern Michigan or Ferris State I’d be worried that a potential recruit might say he’d rather leave the rink in February when its only 40 degrees in Alabama as opposed to walking out into the Marquette or Big Rapids night air where it’s minus-10 with a foot of snow. How could that thought not cross your mind? Then again if you are Michigan or Miami or Northern Michigan (which keeps finding its way into the CCHA’s final four) do you worry about a kid you are recruiting for a third-line role his freshman year who decides he’ll get first-line minutes at Huntsville a lot faster with a little less depth on the roster. Also food for thought.

Look at the changing landscape of college football. With all due respect, the Big Ten has suffered as a football conference and the SEC and Big 12 have become elite conferences because they offer warm weather all season, a chance for a passing QB to show off his arm in great weather conditions, and play wide open offensive styles because they don’t have to deal with snow, high winds and biting cold. Northern kids are going south to play. Or west — USC’s resurgence isn’t an accident either. Good weather makes for a long fall, a nice winter semester and an early spring.

The real issue here is growth; the other issues are just speculation. If Huntsville goes the way of Iona, Fairfield, Kent State, Findlay and Wayne State, it is another program at the Division I level that will never return, and that means 25-28 less roster spots for American kids wanting to play college hockey.

Or do we look at it like we do GM, Chrysler and Ford? All three struggled for various reasons and only Ford seems to have found itself. We live in a capitalist society of survival of the fittest, and if the market of Huntsville, Ala., isn’t fit to survive in the landscape of Division I college hockey, maybe it is best for the overall good of the game to let it slide back to D-III. That is for Bruce McLeod, Tom Anastos, Steve Hagwell, Joe Bertagna and the rest of the NCAA folks who govern college hockey to decide.

The International Hockey League was a great AAA league in the 1990s — it was in awesome markets and was like a mini NHL the way it was run. However, it grew way too fast into markets that couldn’t support it and eventually, like the old World Hockey Association, it folded and saw some of its teams merge into its rival league, in this case the American Hockey League.

The CHA also is departing but its member clubs like Bemidji, Robert Morris and Niagara are all safe. They are also in conferences that geographically work for them to create natural rivalries. Bemidji should thrive as the fifth WCHA team in Minnesota and have a great rivalry with Michigan Tech and North Dakota.

So what happens to Huntsville?

It seems odd that a team whose nickname is also a model of car would be excluded from a league run out of Detroit. Looks like the Alabama-Huntsville Chargers will go the way of the Dodge Charger.

South.

It appeared to be one of the best-laid road maps.

The solution that seemingly was brokered between all college hockey conferences and the 58 member institutions that would find homes for the four “homeless” members of the CHA looked almost too good to be true.

Thanks to the CCHA, looks certainly aren’t meant to be deceiving — this deal certainly was far too good to be true.

In June, when the WCHA announced that it would admit both Bemidji State and CCHA member Nebraska-Omaha, the road was clear for the CCHA to take the final step in displaying solidarity. Atlantic Hockey got the ball rolling when it agreed to take in Niagara and Robert Morris. The final piece of the puzzle lay in Alabama.

The CCHA could admit Alabama-Huntsville, a program with a rich hockey history at the Division II level and a successful member of the Division I ranks in the CHA, and push together the final piece to college hockey’s jigsaw puzzle.

Alas, the CCHA turned up its noses at lonely Huntsville, denying it like an ugly stepchild. The reasons aren’t rising to the surface just yet, but what has been said to this point seems like nothing but college hockey’s version of elitism.

Yes, the CCHA is loaded with some college powerhouses: Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Notre Dame. But there are also some members whose “gear” can’t be bought at your big-box retailers or the commercial sporting goods stores. These schools like Lake Superior State, Alaska, Bowling Green, Western Michigan, Northern Michigan — where were they when it comes to saving a small-school program?

Truth is, they might have fought long and hard for Huntsville. We may never know. The CCHA’s bylaws required nine of 11 members (Nebraska-Omaha wasn’t allowed a vote as it’s on the road to WCHA-ville) to vote in favor of UAH’s admission for it to happen. Enough members turned up their noses at the Chargers, and now this once-proud hockey power might be writing its swan song as it sails toward extinction.

A day later, not a lot has been written, which is expected when offseason news comes about. But Danny Martin of the Daily News-Miner in Fairbanks, Alaska, shared some views from Alaska athletic director Forrest Karr, who had one of the 11 votes in the decision.

These views truly bothered me.

Said Karr, “Some people had concerns about a lack of commitment.” Really? This school has had to survive for more than a decade since the NCAA demolished Division II hockey and it has done so admirably. UAH was a founding member of the CHA, the conference for the programs that just didn’t seem to fit the existing landscape geographically, academically or financially. As CHA members dropped programs, UAH, along with Niagara, Robert Morris and Bemidji State proudly stayed the course. How’s that for commitment?

He also noted that the institution “isn’t in a major recruiting market.” Wow, I didn’t know that Fairbanks, Alaska, was such a hockey hotbed. How about South Bend, Ind.? That market didn’t seem to hurt Notre Dame when it played for the national title in 2008.

A final argument was that student-athlete welfare was a concern because of the “missed class time due to long bus trips.” This one is a real laugher. For starters, Huntsville, Ala., is closer to or about equidistant to Omaha, Neb., for most CCHA schools. That hasn’t destroyed student-athletes to date, has it? Heck, what’s the impact of these same student athletes having to take 10-plus hour plane rides to Fairbanks, Alaska?

When push comes to shove, it’s hard for anyone to substantiate why the CCHA members voted down UAH’s application other than to revert back to my original cry of elitism. The united cry from college hockey over the past few years has been that every conference, every school, should do anything possible to save the current programs that exist. Somehow that message didn’t get to the CCHA.

One final quote from Mr. Karr: “I hope this is not a death sentence for them, and I hope it’s not the end of their program. The last thing anyone wants to see is the loss of any Division I college hockey program.”

OK, so maybe the party-line message did reach the CCHA. Just seems that the membership was too high on their horses, though, to really listen.