{"id":24081,"date":"2001-08-09T09:05:59","date_gmt":"2001-08-09T14:05:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2001\/08\/09\/ecac-committee-delays-final-approval-on-changes\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:54:16","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:54:16","slug":"ecac-committee-delays-final-approval-on-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2001\/08\/09\/ecac-committee-delays-final-approval-on-changes\/","title":{"rendered":"ECAC Committee Delays Final Approval on Changes"},"content":{"rendered":"
The ECAC Policy Committee, the body in charge of granting final approval to a 34-game league schedule, decided during a conference call today to table a final decision until Oct. 1. The delay will allow the Policy Committee members to meet face-to-face amongst themselves and league athletic directors at the annual ECAC AD Convention.<\/p>\n
Two months ago, conference athletic directors gave their stamp of approval<\/a> to increasing the games limit from 32 to the NCAA-standard 34. They also approved the addition of an extra weekend of conference tournament games<\/a>, in order to facilitate the expansion of the tournament to include all 12 league teams.<\/p>\n Both decisions were made pending approval of the Policy Committee, an oversight body comprised of non-sports representatives from each league school. Given the unprecedented cooperation among Ivy and non-Ivy League athletic directors, passage from the Policy Committee has been expected.<\/p>\n Is this delay an indication that those proposals are in jeopardy?<\/p>\n Not necessarily, said ECAC assistant commissioner Steve Hagwell, who said the delay was inspired more by a desire to meet face-to-face.<\/p>\n “Certainly there were some concerns [during the conference call] on the significance of these proposals,” said Hagwell. “But, also, these people haven’t gotten together in some time. Many of them have never met.<\/p>\n “The last issue they had to decide was in 1998, on whether to go to a 10-team tournament. They conducted that vote via e-mail. …<\/p>\n “I’m optimistic that, given the two months we now have, and the face-to-face opportunity the ADs will have … they will come to that meeting and have their questions already answered, and see that it’s in the best intersts of league.”<\/p>\n The increase in the games limit was a source of great optimism, given that the 12 ADs agreed on the proposal unanimously, even though Ivy League schools would still be limited to 29 games.<\/p>\n The question is whether this spirit of cooperation, and desire to “do what’s best for the league,” is shared by the non-sports representatives.<\/p>\n “One [Ivy League committee member] said that on the [conference] call,” Hagwell said. “They said, ‘We don’t want to get into a situation where we create a divide, us vs. them.’<\/p>\n “So, they’re well aware of that desire to have this league function as a league.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The ECAC Policy Committee, the body in charge of granting final approval to a 34-game league schedule, decided during a conference call today to table a final decision until Oct. 1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n