{"id":26183,"date":"2004-01-08T21:07:13","date_gmt":"2004-01-09T03:07:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/01\/08\/this-week-in-the-ecac-jan-8-2004\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:55:35","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:55:35","slug":"this-week-in-the-ecac-jan-8-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/01\/08\/this-week-in-the-ecac-jan-8-2004\/","title":{"rendered":"This Week in the ECAC: Jan. 8. 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"
So much for slow starts to the new year.<\/p>\n
We’re only a week into 2004 and already ECAC hockey is chock full of news: the departure of Vermont, the future of the league and hotly-contested rivalries. It is far from business as usual, but these topics are critical issues that have been forced to the forefront.<\/p>\n
For starters, Vermont’s move to Hockey East is official. The school and Hockey East held a joint press conference Thursday in frigid Burlington to make the announcement we all assumed was a done deal from the moment the Catamounts approached the conference. UVM will start playing in its new conference home beginning with the 2005-06 season.<\/p>\n
“We know that to rank with the best,” explained UVM President Dan Fogel, “we have to compete with the best, and that’s what entrance into Hockey East means to us.”<\/p>\n
The decision-makers at Vermont realized early on the immense benefits that being in the higher-profile conference would afford the program, the student body and future enrollment. Both Fogel, at Louisiana State University, and Director of Athletics Bob Corran, at Minnesota-Duluth, experienced this first-hand before being hired.<\/p>\n
Fogel, Corran and coach Kevin Sneddon are all relatively new to UVM, with Fogel having the longest tenure of the three. He took over in July 2002.<\/p>\n
President Fogel’s vision, which includes a 10-year plan for Vermont, features athletics playing a prominent role on campus and for the University overall. Not coincidentally, Corran’s vision for the Catamounts’ athletic programs lines up well with that of the President.<\/p>\n
“One of the things that impressed me when I was looking at this job,” said Sneddon, “was the ability of the administration to look outside the box. Part of their strategic planning has been how best to improve the University as a whole, the athletic department and, on a smaller scale, Vermont hockey.”<\/p>\n
Clearly, one of those ways is moving to a new conference.<\/p>\n
“In a lot of ways,” Sneddon explained, “Hockey East is a good fit for us. We’re the only public school in the ECAC.”<\/p>\n
That will not be the case in Hockey East.<\/p>\n
Sneddon continued, “Many were shocked when the ECAC first split that Vermont stayed with the ECAC. At the time, Vermont wanted to be associated with the Ivies and the other great schools in the league.”<\/p>\n
Life is a bit different now, though, especially since many of UVM’s other sports teams are in the same conferences as its New England neighbors.<\/p>\n
“This is part of the strategic plan,” Sneddon explained, “and something the administration wanted to explore. As we did, it became more appealing to us. I think we fit well and bring a lot to the table.”<\/p>\n
“I can say with all sincerity,” said Hockey East Commissioner Joe Bertagna, “[that] there wasn’t anything that remotely resembled a minus presented in our meetings and our deliberations. It seemed a natural thing and a natural fit and we’re very excited about what the potential of this marriage holds.<\/p>\n
“I think we would have been as excited without hearing of some of the plans and some of the vision that President Fogel and Director Bob Corran have spelled out. I think just on what we know and have always known about Vermont, this would have been exciting for us. But it is even more so knowing of some of the things that are on the docket down the line for the University of Vermont.”<\/p>\n
In the midst of this tumultuous week, Sneddon was quick to point out, however, that the move will not be the last ECAC fans would see of the Cats.<\/p>\n
“We will still play many ECAC teams,” he said. “We want to keep that connection. Both leagues are good leagues, it’s just a matter of what’s best for Vermont. It’s not about any bad feelings for the ECAC. I have 14 years of positive memories as a player, coach and assistant in this league.”<\/p>\n
“The rivalries we have built up over the years with the ECAC teams are important,” Corran agreed, “and it’s only wise to continue them.”<\/p>\n
Of course, sailing will not be smooth for the Catamounts. The program has struggled to recover from the hazing scandal that forced it to cancel the second half the 1999-2000 season — a move that left travel partner Dartmouth hung out to dry facing well-rested opponents each Saturday.<\/p>\n
Even so, most experts agree that UVM is a sleeping giant with such an immense potential pipeline to recruits in Quebec that it may just be a matter of time before they start knocking on the doors of the Big Four — Boston College, Boston University, Maine and New Hampshire.<\/p>\n
“We have a very serious intent here to build a nationally competitive hockey program on the men’s side and on the women’s side,” said Corran. “We really do believe this gives us the opportunity to do so. We have a coaching staff in place, we have plans in place, we have plans to advance the program.<\/p>\n
“The fit is better for us from an institutional standpoint. It provides us some advantages in terms of recruitment. At the end of the day, being in Hockey East is an important piece of our plans.”<\/p>\n
One thing that will surely help in the intensifying recruiting war is a new arena, which is a prominent part of Fogel’s strategic plan.<\/p>\n
“A new rink has been mentioned since before I got here,” Sneddon said. “In the planning process we wanted to explore that possibility. It has legs, but it is not a done deal. There are always a lot of decisions to make on something like this.<\/p>\n
“There’s a lot of excitement behind it and we look forward to it when it becomes reality.”<\/p>\n
First things first, though. The Cats will play the 2004-05 season in the ECAC before splitting for greener pastures. This begs the question: Where will the ECAC turn to replace UVM?<\/p>\n
All we have to go on are the persistent rumors that Connecticut, Holy Cross, Quinnipiac and Sacred Heart have expressed interest. Others will likely apply, especially with the future of College Hockey America up in the air after Findlay’s decision this week to drop hockey at season’s end.<\/p>\n
Quinnipiac, the strongest program in terms of on-ice success, currently plays its home games in a town rink — but plans are in the works for a new arena. That will be an issue when and if it applies for entrance into the ECAC, much like it was when Quinnipiac inquired with Hockey East a few seasons ago.<\/p>\n
“Although several schools already have contacted us,” said ECAC Commissioner Phil Buttafuoco in a statement released Thursday, “the league will work through its committee structure to review the membership criteria and the philosophical and institutional fit of any prospective member.<\/p>\n
“It is our goal that this initial process will be concluded prior to the ECAC Championship in March, and that any decisions regarding membership are made not later than the conclusion of the spring meetings.”<\/p>\n
As for the ever-present rumor of the Ivies splitting the ECAC, don’t count on it. While our sources confirm that the Ivies are rumored to have been meeting recently about the future of the ECAC, it would take a creative plan for them to leave and maintain some of the benefits they currently enjoy — not the least of which is an automatic NCAA bid. Of course, stranger things have happened.<\/p>\n
Now that the news is official, other members of the ECAC family are starting to share their thoughts. In our conversations today with Union coach Nate Leaman and Harvard assistant captain Rob Fried each had interesting ideas.<\/p>\n
“Hockey East will be a nice fit for the Catamounts,” said Fried. “UVM is a swift, offensive team which will definitely benefit from the bigger ice sheets around Hockey East. Also, it is no secret that Hockey East is an extremely competitive league.<\/p>\n
“Though ECAC teams have performed well against Hockey East, losing a storied program like UVM is a pretty strong blow to the league. Hopefully, the ECAC will find ways to keep other non-Ivy teams from following suit, so we can continue to compete on the national stage.”<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, Leaman thinks the ECAC is at a crossroads of sorts.<\/p>\n
“All you can do is wish them luck and wish them well,” he said about UVM. “For us as a league, we need to sit back and evaluate. We shouldn’t jump out and grab another team just for the sake of grabbing one.<\/p>\n
“Maybe we can redo the schedule. What would make us better? Adding a team or not adding one? Maybe we get out of the travel partner system and have more league games. There may be some benefits that we haven’t thought about yet, but they may hit us when we get together in the spring and have thought about it more.”<\/p>\n
For months, Clarkson, St. Lawrence and Rensselaer have been battling opponents from all over the country in a contest with massive repercussions. None of this, of course, has taken place on the ice.<\/p>\n
Proposal 65 has been the opponent squarely in the eyes of the administration, alumni and fans of each of the ECAC schools, as well as the five other colleges in the NCAA’s crosshairs: Colorado College, Johns Hopkins, SUNY College at Oneonta, Hartwick and Rutgers-Newark.<\/p>\n
Players talk about it with regularity and recruiting for next season has been impacted as well.<\/p>\n
“We continue to battle away on recruiting,” Clarkson coach George Roll said recently, “but there’s no doubt that [the proposal] has affected us adversely. It is the first question that kids ask and we know that other schools are using it against us in recruiting. We’ve lost kids to some good schools; who knows if it played a role?”<\/p>\n
Proposal 65 is legislation that would eliminate a waiver that allows the eight aforementioned Division III schools to offer athletics-related aid to student athletes who play Division I sports at their institutions. The waiver has covered the eight schools since 1983.<\/p>\n
Since news of the proposal first hit, most agreed that the programs in question seemed doomed, but as Monday’s critical final vote approaches, we’ve learned that things are not as gloomy as we’ve assumed.<\/p>\n
From what we’ve been able to dig up, although no one is willing to go on record quite yet for fear of counting chickens before they’ve hatched, it appears that the schools at risk may just win the vote.<\/p>\n