With one more week and a load of significant game results gone by, it’s time for our weekly look at how the NCAA tournament might shake out if the season ended today. It’s something we call “Bracketology” — a look into the thought process behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament. <\/p>\n
This is the second installment; we’ll be bringing you a new one every week until our final picks just before Selection Sunday. If you take a look at the sidebar, you’ll see my brackets from last week and you can compare and contrast on your own. <\/p>\n
Here are the facts: <\/p>\n
Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the Championship Committee: <\/p>\n
In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.\n Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.\n No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.\n Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.\n Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1 through 16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”\n Additionally, the NCAA recently clarified its selection criteria to include a bonus factor in the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) for “good” nonconference wins. <\/p>\n
And one more note: Mass.-Lowell’s forfeits have not been taken into account because the NCAA has not taken any action yet. Therefore, the results of the games played are used here.<\/p>\n
Given these facts, here is the top 13 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), plus Brown, Holy Cross and Bemidji State, the current leaders in the ECAC, Atlantic Hockey and CHA (through games of February 18, 2004): <\/p>\n
1 North Dakota
\n2 Boston College
\n3 Maine
\n4 Michigan
\n4 Minnesota-Duluth
\n6 Minnesota
\n7 St. Cloud State
\n8 New Hampshire
\n9 Miami
\n9 Wisconsin
\n9 Ohio State
\n12 Denver
\n13 Massachusetts
\n19 Brown
\n30 Holy Cross
\n— Bemidji State <\/p>\nStep One<\/b> <\/p>\n
From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament. <\/p>\n
We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add Brown, Holy Cross and Bemidji State. <\/p>\n
From there, we can start looking at the bubble in a more detailed fashion. <\/p>\n
There is only one complicated tie to break: the one at No. 9. Miami beats Wisconsin and Ohio State in individual comparisons, which makes the RedHawks ninth. Wisconsin beats Ohio State — that puts the Badgers No. 10. Also, Michigan beats Minnesota-Duluth in their individual comparison, leaving the Wolverines No. 4 and the Bulldogs No. 5.<\/p>\n
Thus, the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are: <\/p>\n
1 North Dakota
\n2 Boston College
\n3 Maine
\n4 Michigan
\n5 Minnesota-Duluth
\n6 Minnesota
\n7 St. Cloud State
\n8 New Hampshire
\n9 Miami
\n10 Wisconsin
\n11 Ohio State
\n12 Denver
\n13 Massachusetts
\n14 Brown
\n15 Holy Cross
\n16 Bemidji State <\/p>\nStep Two<\/b> <\/p>\n
Assign the seeds:<\/p>\n
No. 1 Seeds — North Dakota, Boston College, Maine, Michigan
\nNo. 2 Seeds — Minnesota-Duluth, Minnesota, St. Cloud State, New Hampshire
\nNo. 3 Seeds — Miami, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Denver
\nNo. 4 Seeds — Massachusetts, Brown, Holy Cross, Bemidji State <\/p>\nStep Three<\/b> <\/p>\n
Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals, starting with No. 1 North Dakota.<\/p>\n
North Dakota is placed in the West Regional.
\nBoston College is placed in the Northeast Regional.
\nMaine is placed in the East Regional.
\nMichigan is placed in the Midwest Regional. <\/p>\nStep Four<\/b> <\/p>\n
Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intraconference matchups if possible. <\/p>\n
Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that in these bands, teams are not<\/i> assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional). Instead, the seeds are set such that the quarterfinals are played by No. 1 v. No. 8, No. 2 v. No. 7, No. 3 v. No. 6 and No. 4 v. No. 5. <\/p>\n
Therefore: <\/p>\n
No. 2 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
No. 8 New Hampshire goes to the Northeast Regional as the host, which is No. 2 Boston College’s Regional.
\nNo. 7 St. Cloud State goes to No. 1 North Dakota’s Regional, which is the West Regional (this is because UNH is at No. 2, not No. 1).
\nNo. 6 Minnesota goes to No. 3 Maine’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
\nNo. 5 Minnesota-Duluth goes to No. 4 Michigan’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional. <\/p>\nNo. 3 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
Making the same analysis, the first-round matchups should be No. 9 v. No. 8, No. 10 v. No. 7, etc., so: <\/p>\n
No. 9 Miami goes to No. 8 New Hampshire’s Regional, which is the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 10 Wisconsin goes to No. 7 St. Cloud State’s Regional, which is the West Regional.
\nNo. 11 Ohio State goes to No. 6 Minnesota’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
\nNo. 12 Denver goes to No. 5 Minnesota-Duluth’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional. <\/p>\nNo. 4 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
One more time, taking No. 16 v. No. 1, No. 15 v. No. 2, etc. <\/p>\n
No. 16 Bemidji State goes to No. 1 North Dakota’s Regional, which is the West Regional.
\nNo. 15 Holy Cross goes to No. 2 Boston College’s Regional, which is the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 14 Brown goes to No. 3 Maine’s Regional, which is the East Regional.
\nNo. 13 Massachusetts goes to No. 4 Michigan’s Regional, which is the Midwest Regional. <\/p>\nThe brackets as we have set them up: <\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 7 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Massachusetts vs. 4 Michigan
\n12 Denver vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 3 Maine
\n11 Ohio State vs. 6 Minnesota <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n9 Miami vs. 8 New Hampshire <\/p>\nOur first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We certainly have some. We have two WCHA-WCHA matchups, one in the West and one in the Midwest. How do we resolve that? <\/p>\n
Because of Minnesota, we can only make one change. It looks like we need one WCHA-WCHA matchup. Now remember that the committee can choose to make an intraconference matchup should there be five or more teams in the tournament from one conference. We have that here. <\/p>\n
So who moves? <\/p>\n
Let’s take a few things into consideration. Let’s look at integrity and attendance issues. <\/p>\n
We would love to get Denver in the West Regional to play in Colorado. So let’s switch Denver with Wisconsin. But we still have two WCHA-WCHA matchups. So let’s move Miami and Wisconsin. <\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n12 Denver vs. 7 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Massachusetts vs. 4 Michigan
\n9 Miami vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 3 Maine
\n11 Ohio State vs. 6 Minnesota <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 8 New Hampshire <\/p>\nWe’ve now gotten rid of one of the two WCHA-WCHA matchups. Is this good enough?<\/p>\n
Let’s try to break down the seedings a little more, looking at the three No. 2 seeds from the WCHA: Minnesota-Duluth, Minnesota and St. Cloud State. Let’s look at the individual comparison situation between the three teams. <\/p>\n
UMD wins both of its comparisons and St. Cloud beats Minnesota. So the “real” ranking among those three teams should be UMD, SCSU and then Minnesota. So perhaps Minnesota should get left with a WCHA-WCHA matchup. That would mean moving Wisconsin to the East Regional to play Minnesota. But that creates two WCHA-WCHA matchups again because we really want to keep Denver in Colorado. Let’s take a look at this bracket:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n12 Denver vs. 7 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Massachusetts vs. 4 Michigan
\n9 Miami vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 3 Maine
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 6 Minnesota <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n11 Ohio State vs. 8 New Hampshire <\/p>\nWe like the way this is laid out except for one thing. Miami, at No. 9, should play a lower seed than No. 5. So we switch Miami and Ohio State. <\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n12 Denver vs. 7 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Massachusetts vs. 4 Michigan
\n11 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 3 Maine
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 6 Minnesota <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n9 Miami vs. 8 New Hampshire<\/b><\/p>\nNow this we can live with. We moved three teams. We have attendance maximization. We have a pretty integral bracket, though we do have two WCHA-WCHA matchups. So that’s our bracket for this week.<\/p>\n
Bracketing the Frozen Four, if all four number-one seeds advance, then the top overall seed plays No. 4, and No. 2 plays No. 3. Therefore, the winners of the Midwest and West Regionals face each other in one semifinal (Michigan and North Dakota’s brackets), while the winners of the East and Northeast Regionals (Maine and Boston College’s brackets) play the other semifinal. <\/p>\n
But… <\/p>\n
Bonus Time<\/h4>\n
We know there is a bonus component to the criteria, the NCAA’s tweak to the system which rewards “good” nonconference wins. <\/p>\n
Without official word on the size of the bonuses, we take these numbers: .005 for a good road win, .003 for a good neutral win and .001 for a good home win, and then we break ties using the method as above. <\/p>\n
Does anything change? Absolutely. <\/p>\n
1 North Dakota
\n2 Boston College
\n3 Maine
\n4 Michigan
\n5 Minnesota-Duluth
\n6 St. Cloud State
\n7 Minnesota
\n8 New Hampshire
\n9 Miami
\n10 Wisconsin
\n11 Ohio State
\n12 Denver
\n13 Michigan State
\n14 Brown
\n15 Holy Cross
\n16 Bemidji State <\/p>\nMichigan State is now in, and Massachusetts is out! And it also makes the change that we made manually above in comparing the three WCHA No. 2 seeds — UMD, SCSU and Minnesota — in that order. <\/p>\n
So, our new brackets are now: <\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 7 Minnesota <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Michigan State vs. 4 Michigan
\n12 Denver vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 3 Maine
\n11 Ohio State vs. 6 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n9 Miami vs. 8 New Hampshire <\/p>\nNow we have the dreaded intraconference matchups, not only WCHA-WCHA, but one CCHA-CCHA matchup. <\/p>\n
Brown and Michigan State is an easy swap. That solves the CCHA-CCHA matchup. We’re back to WCHA-WCHA. Let’s just do what we did above, it worked up there, and it works again. <\/p>\n
Our brackets: <\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
16 Bemidji State vs. 1 North Dakota
\n12 Denver vs. 7 Minnesota <\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
14 Brown vs. 4 Michigan
\n11 Ohio State vs. 5 Minnesota-Duluth <\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
13 Michigan State vs. 3 Maine
\n10 Wisconsin vs. 6 St. Cloud State <\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
15 Holy Cross vs. 2 Boston College
\n9 Miami vs. 8 New Hampshire<\/b> <\/p>\n3-2-1<\/h4>\n
What if we took these numbers: .003 for a good road win, .002 for a good neutral win and .001 for a good home win. <\/p>\n
1 North Dakota
\n2 Boston College
\n3 Maine
\n4 Michigan
\n5 Minnesota-Duluth
\n6 St. Cloud State
\n7 Minnesota
\n8 New Hampshire
\n9 Miami
\n10 Wisconsin
\n11 Ohio State
\n12 Denver
\n13 Michigan State
\n14 Brown
\n15 Holy Cross
\n16 Bemidji State <\/p>\nIt’s the same ranking as if the bonus was 5-3-1, and so our brackets are the same.<\/p>\n
See you next week!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-02-19T00:46:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2010-08-18T00:55:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1175\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"763\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/\",\"name\":\"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-02-19T00:46:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-08-18T00:55:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\"},\"description\":\"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"width\":1175,\"height\":763},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/\",\"name\":\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"description\":\"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\",\"name\":\"Jayson Moy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jayson Moy\"},\"description\":\"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","og_description":"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265","og_site_name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/","article_published_time":"2004-02-19T00:46:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2010-08-18T00:55:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1175,"height":763,"url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jayson Moy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@USCHO","twitter_site":"@USCHO","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jayson Moy","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/","url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/","name":"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","datePublished":"2004-02-19T00:46:14+00:00","dateModified":"2010-08-18T00:55:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0"},"description":"Another week, another set of predictions. USCHO.com brings you an updated look at the NCAA tournament selections.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","width":1175,"height":763},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/02\/18\/bracketology-feb-18-2004\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bracketology: Feb. 18, 2004"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/","name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0","name":"Jayson Moy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jayson Moy"},"description":"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.","url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26265\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26265"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=26265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}