{"id":28139,"date":"2006-03-08T21:38:26","date_gmt":"2006-03-09T03:38:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2006\/03\/08\/the-pairwise-analyzed-march-8-2006\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:56:31","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:56:31","slug":"the-pairwise-analyzed-march-8-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2006\/03\/08\/the-pairwise-analyzed-march-8-2006\/","title":{"rendered":"The PairWise Analyzed: March 8, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"
Last weekend’s results nicely separated the haves from the have-nots. Six teams — the same as last week — are designated as locks, but now another four teams may be only one win away from securing at-large bids to the NCAA tournament, while a few more can breathe a sigh of relief with wins in best-of-3 playoff series.<\/p>\n
Remember that the PairWise Rankings work by comparing teams against one another, one pair at a time (hence the name), in four statistical categories: the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI), record in head-to-head games, record against common opponents, and record against Teams Under Consideration (TUCs) — teams with an RPI rating of at least .500.<\/p>\n
Note:<\/b> All rankings before team names below refer to PWR rankings, not the national polls. This week, due to a number of ties near the bubble that merit attention, I have ranked teams after using the PWR tiebreakers. Also, all PWR and RPI numbers cited include a .003-.002-.001 bonus for “quality” nonconference wins. Results are through all games of March 8, 2006.<\/p>\nThe Locks<\/h4>\n
No. 1 Minnesota, No. 2 Wisconsin, No. 3 Miami<\/b>: Minnesota is a No. 1 seed no matter what happens from here on out, and will likely be the top overall seed in the NCAA tournament. Similarly, Wisconsin is on track for a No. 1 seed of its own, meaning that these two teams will likely spend the weekend of March 24-26 in Grand Forks (Gophers) and Green Bay (Badgers), taking on the CHA and Atlantic Hockey tournament champions in some combination. It’s been suggested that Minnesota might get a raw deal by potentially facing North Dakota in Grand Forks as the overall No. 1 seed, but what goes around, comes around: Minnesota hosted last year’s West Regional and won two games in overtime. Miami will pin down the third No. 1 seed by winning this weekend’s series against Western Michigan, and would probably end up in Albany pending the finish to Boston University and Michigan State’s seasons.<\/p>\n
No. 4 Boston University, No. 5 Michigan State<\/b>: The Terriers and the Spartans are in a dogfight for the last No. 1 seed, which could come down to something as simple as the head-to-head PWR comparison between these two. BU holds the edge right now in RPI (.5627 to .5603) and record against TUCs (11-6-4, .6190 versus 13-8-7, .5893), but a BU series loss (to Massachusetts) and a Spartan win (over Alaska-Fairbanks) in this weekend’s playoffs would flip that to make MSU the fourth and final No. 1 seed. Either way, these two are currently on a collision course to meet in the regional finals in Worcester, where BU is hosting.<\/p>\n
No. 6 Colorado College<\/b>: A one-point weekend against archrival Denver didn’t really hurt CC for now. The Tigers had little chance to move up to a No. 1 seed no matter what happened last weekend thanks to their oft-mentioned mediocre record against TUCs, which is now 11-11-2 (.5000). But the Tigers can still fall; a sweep by St. Cloud State in this weekend’s WCHA first round would send CC’s RPI spiraling down, potentially costing the Tigers several comparisons and putting them uncomfortably close to the bubble. They should still be in even under that dire circumstance, but a No. 2 seed is likelier assuming a series win.<\/p>\nOne Win And In?<\/h4>\n
No. 7 Nebraska-Omaha<\/b>: After getting over a big bump in the road in the form of Bowling Green last weekend, the Mavericks’ final test for NCAA qualification comes against Northern Michigan. UNO can seal the deal with a series win — even one win in three games might be enough to settle matters. Like the Tigers, the Mavs can’t realistically move up to a No. 1 seed, but they can fall into bubble territory with a loss via a two-game sweep. That’s because their RPI of .5444 is just barely ahead of several other teams, against which the head-to-head PairWise comparison is riding on — you guessed it — the RPI. For that reason, UNO is less secure in its bid than Harvard, which is winning its comparisons by solid margins.<\/p>\n
No. 8 Harvard<\/b>: Harvard plays TUC St. Lawrence in the ECACHL quarterfinals this weekend, meaning that those games have big-time meaning for both schools. The Crimson’s record against TUCs (9-6-1, .5938) is its strength, versus a solid-but-not-stunning RPI of .5458. Both would fall with losses to SLU, but it would take a lot of wins by bubble teams to push the Crimson out of the NCAA picture. Like UNO, a series win this weekend seals the deal, and like UNO, one win in the series would probably do it.<\/p>\n