{"id":28685,"date":"2006-11-09T15:22:47","date_gmt":"2006-11-09T21:22:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2006\/11\/09\/200607-nescac-preview\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:56:41","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:56:41","slug":"200607-nescac-preview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2006\/11\/09\/200607-nescac-preview\/","title":{"rendered":"2006-07 NESCAC Preview"},"content":{"rendered":"
It would be somewhat easy for me to take a look at last year’s preview of the NESCAC conference and repeat many of the comments brought forth by the league coaches there are a lot of similar themes. Like last year the defending league and national champions are coming out of Middlebury and everyone has them picked as the consensus number one in conference and beyond based on their recent run of success. But go ahead and ask how does the rest of the league shape up in terms of challengers and what will be the finish order and you also get a consensus of a different kind — it’s really a wide open league.<\/p>\n
“As we have seen in the past few seasons, you can be in a home ice position coming into the last games of the season and be out in just one weekend — that’s how small the gap is among these teams,” said Williams head coach Bill Kangas. “We finished second last year and ended up with Trinity in the first round where we lost so anything can happen with the caliber of teams in this conference.”<\/p>\n