{"id":31389,"date":"2010-07-16T10:47:18","date_gmt":"2010-07-16T15:47:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2010\/07\/16\/court-reinstates-suit-against-ncaas-ticket-system\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:58:01","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:58:01","slug":"court-reinstates-suit-against-ncaas-ticket-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2010\/07\/16\/court-reinstates-suit-against-ncaas-ticket-system\/","title":{"rendered":"Court Reinstates Suit Against NCAA’s Ticket System"},"content":{"rendered":"
The NCAA faces a lawsuit regarding the legality of its ticket-lottery system for events such as the men’s Frozen Four.<\/p>\n
A U.S. appeals court in Chicago on Friday reversed the 2009 dismissal of the case by a federal judge, Bloomberg<\/i> reported.<\/p>\n
That clears the way for the case to determine whether the NCAA’s $6 to $10 handling fee — which it at one point kept regardless of whether the customer was awarded tickets through the lottery — is legal under Indiana law.<\/p>\n
The case was brought by consumers in New York, Arizona and Oregon.<\/p>\n
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the practice may violate an Indiana law barring anyone other than the state from running a lottery, Bloomberg<\/i> reported.<\/p>\n
The NCAA argued that the process gave fans only an opportunity to buy tickets at full price and did not constitute a prize.<\/p>\n
But, writing for the majority in a 2-1 decision, Judge John Darrah did not agree.<\/p>\n
“Plaintiffs have alleged all elements of a lottery: they paid a per-ticket or per-entry fee (consideration) to enter a random drawing (chance) in hopes of obtaining scarce, valuable tickets (a prize),” Darrah wrote, according to Reuters<\/i>.<\/p>\n
A lower court will hear further proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The NCAA faces a lawsuit regarding the legality of its ticket-lottery system for events such as the men’s Frozen Four. A U.S. appeals court in Chicago on Friday reversed the 2009 dismissal of the case by a federal judge, Bloomberg reported. That clears the way for the case to determine whether the NCAA’s $6 to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n