{"id":37526,"date":"2011-07-08T23:10:52","date_gmt":"2011-07-09T04:10:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/?p=37526"},"modified":"2011-07-12T22:46:10","modified_gmt":"2011-07-13T03:46:10","slug":"commentary-conference-changes-weaken-the-sport","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2011\/07\/08\/commentary-conference-changes-weaken-the-sport\/","title":{"rendered":"Commentary: Conference changes weaken the sport"},"content":{"rendered":"
What to make of the reports that five teams from the WCHA and up to three from the CCHA will be bolting their respective conferences to form a new “super league?” After months of rumors and rampant speculation about new alignments and new conferences in the wake of the announcement in March of the formation of the Big Ten hockey conference, the report on Thursday took many by surprise.<\/p>\n
You knew there were going to be changes, such as the possible location of the Final Five tournament, but few thought that the WCHA would collapse. Some quotes since the story broke indicate that WCHA officials intended to try to poach Miami and Notre Dame from the CCHA, having already poached Nebraska-Omaha. Instead, if Colorado College, Denver, Minnesota-Duluth, Nebraska-Omaha and North Dakota do form their own conference along with Miami, it looks like the WCHA, long considered the powerhouse conference in college hockey (rivaled only by Hockey East), will soon become a “second-tier” conference.<\/p>\n
That’s not a knock on the programs at the other WCHA schools. Bemidji State was in the Frozen Four just two years ago, and St. Cloud State has made the NCAA tournament seven times. However, with the departure of those five, as well as the departure of Minnesota and Wisconsin for the Big Ten, the WCHA could go from being the conference with the most NCAA Division I hockey championships to one with no D-I NCAA hockey championships (if Michigan Tech sees fit to leave for the CCHA; Bemidji State and Minnesota State won D-II hockey titles).<\/p>\n