{"id":94832,"date":"2013-02-22T14:07:56","date_gmt":"2013-02-22T20:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/hobeywatch\/?p=1677"},"modified":"2013-02-22T14:07:56","modified_gmt":"2013-02-22T20:07:56","slug":"why-the-nomination-is-the-award-for-some-candidates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2013\/02\/22\/why-the-nomination-is-the-award-for-some-candidates\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the nomination is the award for some candidates"},"content":{"rendered":"
I’ll be the first one to admit that the Hobey Watch is not necessarily always about a player who could win the Hobey Baker Award.<\/p>\n
Honestly, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that.<\/p>\n
I know I make the Academy Award comparison often on this blog, but with the Oscars just a couple of days away it’s hard to avoid, and given the response I got with last week’s post on St. Lawrence’s Greg Carey, I think it’s appropriate to revisit.<\/p>\n
On Sunday night, only one film will be named Best Picture (my pick is “Argo,” but I could wind up being completely wrong about that). However, eight other films will forever be referred to as Best Picture nominees, and while it’s not as good as the big prize, it’s a prestigious distinction (perhaps not so prestigious as when there were only five nominees, but that’s a whole other argument, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar summed it up pretty nicely on Esquire.com<\/a>, if you want to go check that out).<\/p>\n